robinhood chain launchpads, compared
the robinhood chain launchpad field is moving fast: the early leader NOXA went dark in mid july after collecting ~$12m in fees, and new platforms appear weekly. here is an honest comparison based on each platform's public materials, kept current. we build pmav.fun, and the table says so plainly; every claim about pmav is verifiable against our verified contracts.
the comparison
every cell below was read from the platform's own public materials on 27 july 2026 and links to the source. where a platform does not publish a number, the cell says so rather than guessing. where a competitor beats us on a number, the table says that too: a comparison you cannot trust is worth nothing to you and nothing to us.
| launchpad | trade fee | creator share | launch cost | graduation | lp lock |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pmav.fun | 1% flat | 0.7% of every trade, forever (70% of the fee), on the curve and after graduation | gas only | in place, same uniswap v4 pool (~$38k mcap eth curve; $42,069 mcap on usdg and stock curves) | permanent full range position, locked by construction, no removal path in the contract |
| ArrowPad.fun | not published as a headline rate | 80% of swap fees per their site, which can exceed pmav's 0.7% depending on the pool's fee tier | one transaction | seeds a uniswap v3 pool | liquidity locked forever per their site |
| Robinfun | 1% | not published as a percentage of trades | gas | $44.0k mcap | uniswap LP 100% burned |
| Arrow launchpad | 2% capped | 1% of every trade (half the 2% fee) | gas | not published | not published |
| Robinlaunch | not published as a headline rate | 0.5% creator rewards on the curve | gas | auto at 2.5 ETH, or direct uniswap v3 pool | liquidity locked forever per their site |
| Froth.meme | 1% on curve trades | 15% of every curve trade fee while bonding, plus DEX royalties via a RoyaltyNFT, per their site | 1,000 FROTH | at 8 ETH raised, seeds their own FrothSwap DEX | LP burned at graduation per their site |
| LaunchHood | not published on their public pages at our last check | not published | not published | bonding curve with graduation per their board | not published |
| Memecoin.fun | not published on their public pages at our last check | not published | not published | raised $3.5m in july 2026 to build a multichain launchpad on robinhood chain, per press coverage; product details pending | not published |
| PONS | 6.9% (as documented at our last check, july 2026) | not published as a fixed rate; the owner can change the split | 0.0005 ETH | platform managed | not published |
| NOXA | shut down july 2026 after collecting roughly $12m in fees · see noxa alternatives | ||||
a note on the newer names. Froth.meme publishes real mechanics: a 1% curve fee with 15% of each trade fee streamed to the creator while bonding, graduation at 8 ETH into their own FrothSwap DEX with the LP burned. that creator stream is 0.15% of each traded dollar while bonding versus pmav's 0.7% forever, and graduating into a platform owned DEX is a different trust model than graduating in place on canonical uniswap v4. LaunchHood runs a bonding curve board but does not publish its fee schedule on its public pages, so compare after reading their docs. Memecoin.fun raised $3.5 million in july 2026 to build a multichain launchpad on robinhood chain; we will add its numbers when the product publishes them.
read the creator column carefully rather than the headline. a big percentage of a fee is not the same as a big percentage of a trade: 80% of an unstated fee can be more or less than pmav's 0.7% of every trade depending on the pool tier, and 1% of a 2% fee is 1% of the trade but on a fee twice as expensive for the people buying your coin. the number that matters to a creator is what share of each traded dollar reaches you, and the number that matters to your holders is what the trade costs them. pmav is 1% to the trader and 0.7% of the trade to you, permanently, on both sides of graduation.
the other column that matters is the one nobody markets: who can change the deal later. pmav's split is a constant in an ownerless contract, so no key exists that could move it. a platform whose owner can edit the split has given you a promise, not a property. that is the difference this table cannot show in a number, so check it in the code before you launch anywhere, including here.
figures from each platform's public pages as of 2026-07-27; platforms change fees, so verify before launching. corrections: admin@pmav.fun.
what actually matters when you pick
- who keeps the fees. a 6.9% trade fee with little to the creator drains your community. pmav's 1% fee sends 70% to the creator wallet on every trade, forever.
- whether the curve is real. pmav's bonding curve is a live uniswap v4 position from the first trade; there is no migration event that can fail or be gamed.
- whether the lock is code or a promise. NOXA proved platform promises can vanish overnight. on pmav the graduated position is locked by the contract itself: there is no function to withdraw it, verified in the public source.
- survivability. pmav's contracts are permissionless and immutable; even if the website disappeared, every pool keeps trading on canonical uniswap v4.
read next
how to launch a coin on robinhood chain · where to launch after NOXA · stock denominated curves, explained